Cross-Border Insolvency: Why India should adopt the UNICTRAL Model Law

Cross-Border Insolvency: Why India should adopt the UNICTRAL Model Law

Cross-Border Insolvency: Why India should adopt the UNICTRAL Model Law

Due to poor management of cash or less cash inflow than what is expected, the company can be declared insolvent by performing certain insolvency proceedings where the liquidator would acquire all the assets of the company, evaluate them & liquidate those assets in order to pay off the debts. Cross-Border Insolvency refers to the treatment of financially burdened debtors where the assets of the debtors are in more than one country or the creditors are in more than one country. Cross-border insolvency deals in three areas:

  • Protects the rights of the foreign creditors who have certain rights on the assets of the debtor which are in the different jurisdiction where the proceedings of the insolvency take place.
  • When the assets of the debtors are in various jurisdictions & the creditor wants to involve those assets in different jurisdiction in the proceedings of insolvency.
  • The insolvency proceedings are going on or commenced on the same debtor in more than on jurisdiction.

Proper cross-border insolvency laws are necessary to protect the rights of foreign investors. Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been formulated for speedy & smooth disposal of cases dealing with insolvency & bankruptcy.

Present Law on Cross Border Insolvency & its defects

At present, cross border insolvency is regulated by Sections 234 & 235 of IBC.

Section 234 of the code states that the Central Government can make any agreements with a foreign country to start with the insolvency proceedings.  Central Government will do so with those countries with which there are reciprocal arrangements. 

Section 235 of the code states that the letter of request can be made to the authority for a foreign nation with which such reciprocal arrangements have been made under section 234. There is no proper procedure for the insolvency proceedings to be conducted which makes the law incomplete. Only giving the right to make reciprocal arrangements with countries through the act does not solve the problem of cross-border insolvency. There should be a proper procedure for it. The insolvency procedure conducted should be equivalent for all the countries entering into the reciprocal arrangements. No such procedure is established in India. Reciprocal agreements does not have a feature of coordinating the procedure of insolvency concerned related to multiple jurisdiction. There should be a proper procedure of insolvency which would be governed by all the foreign nations.

UNCITRAL Model Law: An Overview

The need of this model law aroused due to the issue that every nation has its specific manner of managing the issues of Cross-Border Insolvency & bankruptcy laws which are very diverse. There was no uniform way to deal with the Cross-Border Insolvency issues. So, UNCITRAL received the content of Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency issues on 30th May, 1997 & was passed by United Nations (UN) General Assembly on 15th December, 1997. The basic objective behind this model law is to ensure that the interest of banks & persons involved (including the creditor) are protected in regard to cross-border insolvency matters.

Benefits of Enacting the UNCITRAL Model Law

 With the enactment of this Model law, India will become an attractive destination for foreign creditors for investment. This law is much clearer than the IBC in terms of remedy & procedure followed for foreign entities. It is more flexible, as a State can make changes in it as per the conditions & local insolvency laws. A country could refuse validity of the foreign proceedings if it is against the public policy of the country.

Through this Model Law, coordination between courts & insolvency professionals will exist in national as well as foreign jurisdiction. Cross-Border insolvency requires a proper legal framework. This has been recognized by the legislature as without proper legal provisions there would be a threat for the foreign investors to invest in India. When we look at the current situation in India, India is inviting many foreign nations to invest in the country and to even set up their manufacturing units in the country. So, in order to save their interests and motivate them to invest in the country the formulation of the law is of great importance.  


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *