The Madurai bench of Madras High Court on 18th March, 2021 set aside the order rejecting refund claim of CGST and IGST of the assesse wherein, the entire refund liability of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) got auto populated under a single head i.e. State Goods and Services Tax (“SGST”) in the case of Tvl. Mehar Tex (Petitioner) Vs. Commissioner of Central GST And Central Excise (Respondents). The case is described as under:
Facts of the Case
Petitioner is an exporter and made zero rated sales during the months October 2017,
November 2017 and February 2018. He was also entitled to corresponding refund under all the three heads, namely, SGST, CGST and IGST.
Accordingly a refund application was filed by petitioner where after uploading the file, the entire claim got consolidated and figured under the head of SGST alone.
The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise while considering the refund applications restricted the refund claim to the extent of the petitioner's liability for the respective months only under the head of SGST under Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 and rejected the refund claims made in respect of the other heads.
However, the Respondent rejected the refund claims made in respect of CGST and IGST on the ground that the Petitioner has not furnished any documentary proof in support of his claims, whereas the petitioner had submitted the refund applications manually also.
Can the respondent deny the Petitioner’s claim for refund of CGST and IGST on the ground that the entire refund amount got consolidated under one head i.e. SGST, due to the technical error and new system of software in GSTN?
The bench after considering the above facts and observations passed the following judgements:
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *